[13] しばしば、 section
要素や div
要素との使い分けが難しいと話題にされています。これらの要素と迷う場合は、
おそらく article
要素は使わない方が適当です。
[28] Web Applications 1.0, , https://web.archive.org/web/20041210054847/http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#specific
[1] Re: article: do we really need this? (Ian Hickson <ian@...> 著, 版) http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.w3c.whatwg.discuss/13318
[3] IRC logs: freenode / #whatwg / 20110208 ( ( 版)) http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20110208
[23] [whatwg] <comment> element in HTML5 Spec?, , https://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-December/029459.html
[4] [whatwg] <comment> element in HTML5 Spec? ( 版) http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-July/032568.html
[5] id 属性と class 属性って別にそんなに似てないのに、似てて使い分け難しいけどこう違うんだ、みたいな記事とかで分かるような分からないような説明ばかりされて、そのせいでみんな混乱して、と集団催眠みたいになっていった気がする。
section 要素と article 要素もそうなりつつあるんじゃないの。
[6] [whatwg] Requests for new elements for comments ( ( 版)) http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-January/034506.html
[7] [whatwg] Elements feedback ( ( 版)) http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-September/037461.html
[8] Web Applications 1.0 r7666 Let's try adding even more text explaining article vs section. ( ( 版)) http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7665&to=7666
[9] Web Applications 1.0 r8759 Add some examples of app-like usages to increase example variety ( ( 版)) http://html5.org/r/8759
[10] IRC logs: freenode / #whatwg / 20090916 ( 版) http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20090916#l-441
[20] Adjust the definition of the main element and various examples (annevk著, ) https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/97d84321fc1860f1236766156f6314ce447a1c27
[21] Restrict the main element to be used once per document (annevk著, ) https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/1dec930b3df93c799d5f3f685a46940913476086