WebPerf WG

W3C Web Performance Working Group

仕様書

[25]

歴史

[1] W3C Web Performance Working Group ( ( 版)) <http://www.w3.org/2010/webperf/>

[2] Web Performance Working Group ( ( 版)) <http://www.w3.org/2010/08/webperf.html>

[3] Web Performance Working Group ( ( 版)) <http://www.w3.org/2010/08/webperf.html>

[4] *Proposed* Web Performance Working Group Charter ( (Philippe Le Hegaret 著, 版)) <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2011Feb/0041>

[5] *Proposed* Web Performance Working Group ( ( 版)) <http://www.w3.org/2011/02/webperf.html>

[6] W3C Workshop on Web Performance ( ( 版)) <http://www.w3.org/2012/11/performance-workshop/>

[7] IRC logs: freenode / #whatwg / 20150226 ( 版) <http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20150226#l-593>

# [21:40] <Ms2ger> longdesc is a rec

# [21:40] <Ms2ger> Good job everyone

# [21:40] <Ms2ger> Can we now finally go back to something useful?

# [21:48] <smaug____> like reviewing perf wg's specs? Sounds like a good idea

# [21:48] * smaug____ hears Ms2ger just volunteered

# [21:48] <Ms2ger> I was thinking more shutting them down on the next rechartering

# [21:49] <jamesr___> sgtm

# [21:49] <jamesr___> like most things in w3c it was created to work around other badness in w3c process

# [21:49] <jamesr___> now that all vendors have official joined the WG there's no point in having it be separate

# [21:50] <jamesr___> (before they joined there was the possibility of moving things through that WG faster than others like public-webapps due to membership differences)

# [21:50] <smaug____> (perf wg's issues aren't w3c process issues)

[8] Web Performance Working Group ( 版) <https://w3c.github.io/charter-webperf/>

[9] w3c/charter-webperf ( 版) <https://github.com/w3c/charter-webperf>

[10] W3C Webperf Tracker ( 版) <http://igrigorik.github.io/issue-tracker/>

[11] Web Performance Working Group ( 版) <https://w3c.github.io/charter-webperf/>

[12] Making sense of the various web performance specifications (Boris Zbarsky 著, 版) <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2015Jun/0057.html>

[13] Web Performance Working Group charter review (Philippe Le Hegaret 著, 版) <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2015Jun/0066.html>

[14] Web Performance Working Group ( 版) <http://www.w3.org/2015/05/webperf-charter.html>

[15] Web Performance Working Group ( 版) <https://w3c.github.io/charter-webperf/>

[16] w3c/charter-webperf ( 版) <https://github.com/w3c/charter-webperf>

[17] Shut down the webperf wg, move all specs to webapps. · Issue #19 · w3c/charter-webperf ( 版) <https://github.com/w3c/charter-webperf/issues/19>

[18] W3C Webperf Tracker ( 版) <https://w3c.github.io/webperf-dashboard/>

[19] Performance API's, Security and Privacy ( ()) <https://w3c.github.io/perf-security-privacy/>

[20] A Primer for Web Performance Timing APIs ( ()) <https://w3c.github.io/perf-timing-primer/>

[21] ( ()) <https://www.w3.org/2016/06/WebPerfWGroadmap.html>

[22] ( ()) <https://www.w3.org/2016/06/WebPerfF2FJun2116.html>

[23] Web Performance Working Group Revised Charter Approved; join the Web Performance Working Group (Call for Participation) (Xueyuan Jia著, ) <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2016Jul/0003.html>

[24] Web Performance Working Group Charter () <https://www.w3.org/2016/07/webperf>

[26] Adopting a dual spec/testing process for webperf specs (Philippe Le Hégaret著, ) <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2017Mar/0023.html>

[27] Unsubscribing from the list (Boris Zbarsky著, ) <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2017Apr/0000.html>

[28] Please fix at least your broken links, if you want anyone to ever make any sense of your specs · Issue #65 · w3c/navigation-timing () <https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/65>

[29] Borisさんのツイート: "Tired of explaining to working groups that hidden action at a distance makes it hard to read and implement specs. They just don't care." () <https://twitter.com/bz_moz/status/849249619758522368>

[30] Please integrate directly with HTML · Issue #63 · w3c/navigation-timing () <https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/63>

[31] Borisさんのツイート: "@igrigorik @annevk @yoavweiss @toddreifsteck Just to be clear, those are NOT the issues that led me to give up on the webperf working group. The fundamental approach to specs did." () <https://twitter.com/bz_moz/status/850049673448628224>

[32] FYI: We adopted a dual spec/testing process for webperf specs (Philippe Le Hégaret著, ) <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2017May/0008.html>

[33] Recharter proposal: 2018-2020 by igrigorik · Pull Request #37 · w3c/charter-webperf () <https://github.com/w3c/charter-webperf/pull/37>

[34] *PROPOSED* Web Performance Working Group Charter () <https://rawgit.com/w3c/charter-webperf/18-20-charter/index.html>

[35] w3c/charter-webperf: Web Performance Group charter () <https://github.com/w3c/charter-webperf>