[4] Scholarly HTML は、 XHTML と RDFa を学術論文の記述に用いようとする活動とその仕様です。

[1] Scholarly HTML ( 版) https://w3c.github.io/scholarly-html/

[2] Scholarly HTML | Guidelines and tools for web based research and scholarship () http://scholarlyhtml.org/

Scholarly HTML is four things:

  1. It’s a movement: committed to bringing scholarship to the web using standard web approaches – ie HTML, and links rather than PDF. Scholarly HTML builds on the ‘Beyond the PDF‘ movement and grew out of the January 2011 meeting in San Diego.
  2. It’s a format: a ‘profile’ of HTML that sets out conventions for encoding scholarly content in a declarative way using standard approaches such as RDFa and established microformats.
  3. It’s a a set of tools: to help authors create Scholarly HTML
  4. Documentation: how-to guides for the above.

The abbreviated form of the name is ScHTML and people have started pronouncing that Scuml.

[3] Scholarly HTML Community Group () https://www.w3.org/community/scholarlyhtml/

[5] 今時 XHTML + RDFa とか言ってて大丈夫なんですかね。。。

[8] >>5 article とか使っている (つまり HTML5 な) のに RDFa 使うというこれ完全なる矛盾。

[9] >>8 なんでそんなことに、と思ったら編集者に W3C HTML 5.0 の編集者が。 確かに W3C 的には両者は共存できるという見解なんだった。 HTML 5.0 普通じゃない世界。

[6] A very brief history of Scholarly HTML | Gobbledygook () http://blogs.plos.org/mfenner/2011/03/19/a-very-brief-history-of-scholarly-html/

[7] Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Peter Murray-Rust著, ) https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-scholarlyhtml/2017Sep/0016.html

[10] PubCSS はもっと穏健なやつ。