[4] [DFN[Scholarly HTML]] は、 [[XHTML]] と [[RDFa]] を[[学術論文]]の記述に用いようとする活動とその[[仕様]]です。

[1] [CITE[Scholarly HTML]]
([TIME[2016-03-19 05:01:32 +09:00]] 版)
<https://w3c.github.io/scholarly-html/>

[FIG(quote)[
[FIGCAPTION[
[2] [CITE@en-US[Scholarly HTML | Guidelines and tools for web based research and scholarship]]
([TIME[2016-10-21 12:53:55 +09:00]])
<http://scholarlyhtml.org/>
]FIGCAPTION]

> Scholarly HTML is four things:
= It’s a movement: committed to bringing scholarship to the web using standard web approaches – ie HTML, and links rather than PDF. Scholarly HTML builds on the ‘Beyond the PDF‘ movement and grew out of the January 2011 meeting in San Diego.
= It’s a format: a ‘profile’ of HTML that sets out conventions for encoding scholarly content in a declarative way using standard approaches such as RDFa and established microformats.
= It’s a a set of tools: to help authors create Scholarly HTML
= Documentation: how-to guides for the above.
> The abbreviated form of the name is ScHTML and people have started pronouncing that Scuml.

]FIG]


[3] [CITE@en-US[Scholarly HTML Community Group]]
([TIME[2016-10-21 12:55:09 +09:00]])
<https://www.w3.org/community/scholarlyhtml/>

[5] 今時 [[XHTML]] + [[RDFa]] とか言ってて大丈夫なんですかね。。。

[8] >>5 [CODE[article]] とか使っている (つまり [[HTML5]] な) のに
[[RDFa]] 使うというこれ完全なる矛盾。

[9] 
>>8 なんでそんなことに、と思ったら[[編集者]]に [[W3C]] [CITE[HTML 5.0]]
の[[編集者]]が。
確かに [[W3C]] 的には両者は共存できるという見解なんだった。 [SEE[ [[HTML 5.0]] ]]
普通じゃない世界。


[6] [CITE@en-US[A very brief history of Scholarly HTML | Gobbledygook]]
([TIME[2017-09-13 21:58:25 +09:00]])
<http://blogs.plos.org/mfenner/2011/03/19/a-very-brief-history-of-scholarly-html/>

[7] [CITE@en[Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli?]]
([[Peter Murray-Rust]]著, [TIME[2017-09-08 21:13:15 +09:00]])
<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-scholarlyhtml/2017Sep/0016.html>



[10] 
[[PubCSS]] はもっと穏健なやつ。